NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 and 512MB VRAM GRID K220Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000
+12%
2.573 TFLOPS
GRID K220Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M4000
+61%
271
GRID K220Q
168
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1664
Shading Units
1536
104
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.47 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
80.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.573 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
80.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK104
GM204-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
