Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M +440%
2.496 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GT200B
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy