Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +907%
4.252 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF106
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy