Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1038MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +19%
4.252 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M5000 +13%
332
Quadro K5200
293
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2304
128
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK110B
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy