Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (1785MHz vs 1038MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +16%
4.252 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU117
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy