Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +8%
4.252 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M5000
330
Tesla K20Xm +12%
372
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000 +38%
87
Tesla K20Xm
63
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
2688
128
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK110
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy