NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+548%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GT200B
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
