NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+2481%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
1536
Shading Units
48
96
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GT216
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
