NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+818%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M5000M
+1209%
275
Quadro K1000M
21
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK107
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
