NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+15663%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1536
Shading Units
8
96
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.920 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.920 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.20 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G98
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
G98-875-U2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
