NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+10%
3.318 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
2810
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+14%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
1312
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+14%
1505
Blender
Quadro M5000M
275
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+68%
463
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M
61
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+16%
71
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU117
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
