NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+1192%
38.71 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
2810
RTX A6000
+531%
17742
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
1312
RTX A6000
+610%
9324
Blender
Quadro M5000M
275
RTX A6000
+1858%
5387
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M
61
RTX A6000
+883%
600
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
1536
Shading Units
10752
96
TMUs
336
64
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA102
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
