Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
12928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +5144%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
13312
16
TMUs
832
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
58.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy