NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+20325%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
19456
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.328 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
16.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
799.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
24.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
146 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
