NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q
+177%
2.218 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.328 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
16.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
-
-
-
799.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
24.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
