Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +1999%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GK107
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy