Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +1936%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
41W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GK107
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy