Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1005MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +1963%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy