NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (1950MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+299%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
