NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 150M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 150M
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
+2100%
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
24
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.120 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
2.120 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GT200B
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
