Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (21W vs 45W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

21W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
G71
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy