NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
6904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+66042%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
108
8
Shading Units
6912
4
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
