Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 30W)
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M +4009%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
86 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

23W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy