Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
2680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +18638%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2688
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy