Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050 +4795%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro NVS
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
14
8
Shading Units
448
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
900W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy