NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (2495MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 295W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
+513%
61.32 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Jan 2020
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1855 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
6144
Shading Units
3584
384
TMUs
224
192
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
96
RT Cores
56
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
295W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
TU102
Navi 31
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
