Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 47W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 +8134%
1.894 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

47W
TDP
12W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
G98
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy