NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (2050MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+464%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
