Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1291MHz vs 977MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile +197%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile +100%
54
Quadro M620 Mobile
27
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
756 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
977 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
512
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.63 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.26 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy