Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1480MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +115%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
40
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GM107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy