NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1650MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
RTX A4500
+680%
23.65 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
2973
RTX A4500
+331%
12815
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
1350
RTX A4500
+372%
6380
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1050 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
320bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
40
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA102
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
