NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 3GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+194%
3.031 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
40
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GF100
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
