Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1493MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +189%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2e
160bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
40
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy