NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1493MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 5GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
+61%
3.822 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2200
+167%
3410
Quadro K5100M
1273
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2200
+202%
1536
Quadro K5100M
507
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
