NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1335MHz vs 1215MHz)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
3.11 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+75%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1088 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
16
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GA107S
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
