NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+202%
3.11 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
448
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF100
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
