NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1404MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
+98%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
