Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1543MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +166%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
8192
112
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy