NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
+141%
5.53 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
