Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +8153%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
32
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy