Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +12468%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy