NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
+1398%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
128
112
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
171W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
G80
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
