Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1950MHz vs 1252MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +523%
3.994 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1228 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net