NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1252MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000
+967%
6.844 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P400
612
Quadro M6000
+743%
5162
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P400
196
Quadro M6000
+1132%
2415
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1228 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GM200
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
