Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1228MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000 Max Q
4.401 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +214%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1114 MHz
Base Clock
-
1228 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
7680
112
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
137.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
68.77 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
4.401 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
137.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N17E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy