Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000 +415%
5.304 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1202 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
247W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF110
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy