Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +718%
8.873 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GK104
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy