Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1785MHz vs 1733MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +142%
8.873 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU117
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy