Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P520 Mobile +1333%
1.147 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1303 MHz
Base Clock
-
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
35.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
17.92 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1147 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
35.83 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy