NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1569MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+24%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
56
2560
Shading Units
3584
160
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
